Just when I didn't think I had weekend plans, the internet and the mouse-eared execs delivered. It has been "announced" that JJ Abrams will direct the next Star Wars movie. Episode VII.
Or will he? I'm slightly confused by the official unofficialness of these "reports" everyone sites. In a world when a fake girlfriend's death could get national coverage, you'd think someone would learn to start independently checking these things. But the story is all over the place, so I imagine it may probably almost be true.
Which means that now my weekend will consist of ignoring and avoiding comments and critics from people that think they know the best way to handle Star Wars. They'll be clogging my Twitter feed and destroying my Facebook (this last part might not be entirely accurate, since I know unsubscribe to many on Facebook.) I don't even know where to begin with this pile of bullshit that's already as high as that stupid Mayan pyramid on Yavin.
Yes, Abrams worked on Star Trek. Okay. That's not really an argument. He hasn't already made "His Star Wars" by making Star Trek. The universes have similarities the same way they have similarities to humanity, but they two different, equally popular franchises for a reason. Star Wars deals more with myths and legends than Star Trek. Star Wars is a fairy tale to our world. It's a galaxy where heroes can exist and do amazing things and a lot of stuff is just crazy fucking coincidence. (Oh, you just made out with your sister? Super awkward.) Star Trek is more of a social commentary on the modern time through the lens of the past. (If you don't believe me, rewatch the old episodes. They deal with a lot of heavy shit on any version of the Enterprise.)
Star Wars is very much action and adventure, or at least the original trilogy was. I'm still trying to figure out what the prequels were about. (EDITOR'S NOTE: This is not a joke. He really is confused by all the talk of trade embargos and midichlorians.) Star Trek is action, but with an examination of morals and/or what it means to be a human.
So, yes, you brain dead idiots, Star Wars and Star Trek, both take place in space - so do You Only Live Twice, Apollo 13, and Space Cowboys, but they're all different movies. By the same logic, he shouldn't have made Into Darkness because he already made "his Star Trek." Fucking ludicrous.
Let's also remember that Abrams is a good-fucking director and all-around artist. Look at his body of work. He's had his hands all-over the place and come up with some great stuff. Not only is there a measure of quantity to his work, but also quality. Zack Snyder was mentioned a week ago and quite frankly I find him overrated because all his movies are in the exact same style.
So yes, he may have made a movie set in space already (two, if you count Into Darkness) and he might have worked on the sworn enemy of Star Wars nerds, BUT there's something that is getting missed. He was incredibly loyal to the idea of staying as true as possible to the Star Trek lore. He didn't want to discredit anything, he didn't want to change it, he didn't want to piss the shit out of fans. Isn't this the guy you want making a Star Wars movie? After getting dragged over the coals by Lucas, shouldn't it be put in the hands of someone who is trying to hang onto those people that like him grew up pretending to be Han Solo. (Let's face it, no one wanted to be Luke - it meant losing a hand kissing your sister.)
It seems from my "research" of angry men living with their parents that they aren't looking at it from a business perspective. Disney just invested billions into Lucasfilm - mainly Star Wars - and they need a return on that investment. Deals are still inked with Dark Horse for the comics, but they'll be switching over to Marvel eventually. Deals are still inked with the rights for the first films with FOX. Plus FOX owns the first one indefinitely, so something will need to be worked out. So while they will be getting money, they also need something big that will bring people in and cement interest in their future plans. They need to get the bad taste out of people's mouths from that last ridiculous scene in Sith.
What do they do? How do they accomplish this? First, get a talented guy to work on the script -- Michael Arndt, he wrote Little Miss Sunshine and Toy Story 3. Then get a talented director -- JJ Abrams. Which will probably boil down to one thing: get people that know what they're doing, will try to please the fans and stay true to the galaxy we all love.
I've seen a variation of this a few times too. "Abrams is a boring choice. He's a safe choice." To that I say: "Fuck you." Again, not thinking clearly and with an eye towards business. They want someone who has proven themselves with something on this scale. Again, they invested fucking billions. Who should they have gone with? The asshole that directed the Wax Vac commercial? Someone who's movies are a little more on the fringe and haven't made shitloads of money? Maybe Disney will take risks with other projects later, but everyone's looking for something great in this next one and they need people with proven talent. Sorry if you find proven skill talent.
I also saw an article that was upset that one man was essentially being put in charge of all our "myths." Or that a group of people were being put in charge of our "myths." And to that that I say: "Fuck you." Look, there are some really good people out there that want to do great stuff. A few people getting hired to tell nerdy stories isn't a bad thing, because these guys are pretty fucking good. Also, let's think of people not in the Abrams circle: Joss Whedon, Shane Black (Iron Man 3), Marc Webb (The Amazing Spider-Man), and Dan Trachtenberg, who will be directing the adaptation of Y:The Last Man. I'll try to find the article and add it in later, but the gist was pointing to certain people being involved with movies, while negating that people were working on these movies that were not in this nerd illuminati. Fuck you. You can't pick and choose what to look at, this isn't Nancy Grace.
All this being said, could JJ Abrams make a terrible Star Wars director? Yes. Could it be worse than Episode I? Probably not. There's not a lot of information to go off of yet, it's been less than a day since the announcement and already I'm sick of people speculating over nothing, or being cynical and sardonic just because they think it looks cool. Based on the facts, which I have possibly stated here, I think it's probably one of the better choices. I can't think of someone who I know would be able to put together a better movie. Although, since JJ Abrams is involved I know I'll be more likely to try and actually see it around when it comes out. I will also probably have a good chance of getting my fiance (wife by that point - holy shit!) to see it with me. Thanks, JJ!
FINAL THOUGHT: I can't help but wonder if people would be this worked up if Abrams was directing a follow-up to Stargate. I'm guessing no.